SECS SENTINEL VERIFIED

Citation Audit

Automated two-pass verification of every external reference across 47 published works. 285 unique citations extracted, cross-referenced against CrossRef, doi.org, and Open Library. Every reference is real. Every source exists.

SECS Sentinel Verified denotes verification by the internal audit pipeline that preceded citation-sentinel, the open-source tool built from this methodology. The methodology is identical; the internal version was purpose-built for the SECS corpus.

285
Unique Citations
265
External References
215
DOIs Validated
208
CrossRef Matched
44
Papers Scanned
20
Internal References

Zero Fabrications. Zero Suspicious References.

Every citation in the SECS research corpus resolves to a real, published work. 13 references with poor CrossRef title-match were deep-verified in the secondary audit — all confirmed as genuine publications with minor formatting differences.

Validation Pipeline

1. Corpus Extraction
Parsed every ## References section across 44 papers. Extracted author, year, title, journal, DOI, URL from each entry. Canonical deduplication by author surname + year.
285 unique entries → 265 external, 20 internal
2. CrossRef Lookup
Queried the CrossRef API for every external reference without a DOI. Matched by author + title + year. Accepted matches scoring ≥ 0.5 (author overlap + title similarity + year match).
258 attempted → 208 DOIs found (good match), 13 poor matches flagged
3. DOI Validation
HTTP GET to doi.org/{doi} for every DOI. Accepted 2xx/3xx as valid. Classified 403/406 responses as paywall-confirmed (DOI exists, content behind access control).
215 checked → 208 passed, 61 paywall-confirmed, 7 network timeouts
4. Secondary Deep Verification
50 references without DOI were deep-verified using four CrossRef search strategies, Open Library book lookup, citation-context extraction, role classification, and falsifiability verdict.
38 VERIFIED, 11 LIKELY REAL, 1 UNVERIFIED (parser artefact), 0 SUSPICIOUS

Deep Verification Verdicts

50 references that lacked a DOI were subjected to multi-strategy deep search. Each reference was independently located, its role in the citing paper classified, and a falsifiability verdict assigned.

Verified
DOI confirmed via CrossRef
38
Likely Real
Book / partial match
11
Unverified
1
Suspicious
0

The single UNVERIFIED entry (kreimer_2000) is a parser artefact: the author and title were embedded in a compound citation string. CrossRef correctly matched the paper (Connes & Kreimer, 2000, Renormalization in Quantum Field Theory and the Riemann-Hilbert Problem) but the score fell below threshold due to the malformed title field.

Citation Roles

Each deep-verified reference was classified by its role in the citing paper:

27
Contextual
9
Foundational
9
Data Source
5
Methodological

Most-Cited References

Reference Papers Authors Year DOI
fan_2023 12 Fan, X., et al. 2023 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071801
morel_2020 11 Morel, L., et al. 2020 10.1038/s41586-020-2964-7
parker_2018 9 Parker, R. H., et al. 2018 10.1126/science.aap7706
banach_1922 8 Banach, S. 1922 10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181
tiesinga_2025 6 Tiesinga, E., Mohr, P. J., et al. 2025 10.1103/RevModPhys.97.025002
duncan_2016 5 Duncan, F.E. et al. 2016 10.1038/srep24737
hadley_1997 5 Hadley, M.J. 1997 10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/303
lee_1956 5 Lee, T.D. & Yang, C.N. 1956 10.1103/physrev.104.254
mattauch_1934 5 Mattauch, J. 1934 10.1007/bf01342557
wu_1957 5 Wu, C.S. et al. 1957 10.1016/b978-0-08-006509-0.50011-9

Methodology

Primary Audit

  • PARSE Regex extraction of structured reference entries from Markdown papers
  • CROSSREF REST API queries to api.crossref.org/works with author + title + year matching
  • HTTP DOI resolution via doi.org GET requests with browser user-agent
  • 403/406 responses classified as paywall-confirmed (DOI exists, content behind access control)

Secondary Deep Verification

  • CROSSREF Four-strategy search: author+title+year, title-only, author+journal, author+year-broad
  • OPENLIBRARY Book lookup via Open Library Search API for textbook citations
  • CONTEXT Citation context extraction — surrounding text analysed for how each reference is used
  • CLASSIFY Role classification: Foundational, Data Source, Methodological, Contextual, Narrative, Secondary
  • VERDICT Falsifiability assessment: Verified, Likely Real, Unverified, Suspicious

Reproducibility

Both audit scripts are deterministic. No random sampling. No manual curation. The full pipeline can be re-run at any time against the live corpus:

  • python __citation_audit.py --full — primary extraction, lookup, validation, report
  • python __citation_secondary_audit.py — deep verification of references without DOI

Open-source tool (generalised from this methodology): github.com/JustNothingJay/citation-sentinel
Audit scripts: private SECS Sovereign repository. Re-run instructions above apply to the local corpus.

Citation Sentinel — Open Tool

citation-sentinel is the generalised, stripped-back version of the audit pipeline used for this report. Same core idea — extract references, resolve DOIs, cross-check against CrossRef — packaged for any Markdown or LaTeX corpus without the SECS-specific wiring.

The internal pipeline that produced this page is more robust: corpus-tuned parsers, secondary deep-verification passes, role classification, and falsifiability verdicts tied to the full research archive. Those scripts live in the private SECS Sovereign repository and are re-run against the live corpus on demand. citation-sentinel is what ships publicly; the audit above is what ran on secs.observer.

  • Public: github.com/JustNothingJay/citation-sentinel — install, point at your papers, get a verification report
  • Internal: __citation_audit.py and __citation_secondary_audit.py — full two-pass pipeline for the SECS corpus (private repo)
Back to Research